Skip to content

Conversation

@justinsb
Copy link
Contributor

@justinsb justinsb commented Sep 5, 2025

This flag was removed in kubernetes/kubernetes#130162 , and so I believe has no longer been required since at least 1.31


Don't pass deprecated cloud-provider flag (and related feature flags) to kube-apiserver

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Sep 5, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from cpanato and dims September 5, 2025 03:13
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Sep 5, 2025

Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-gcp ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 01a28dc
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-gcp/deploys/68bb6c01cba30e00081e9a9b
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1526--kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-gcp.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 5, 2025
@justinsb justinsb mentioned this pull request Sep 5, 2025
timeoutForControlPlane: 20m
extraArgs:
cloud-provider: gce
#extraArgs:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we remove this instead of commenting if that is not required anymore?

Copy link
Member

@damdo damdo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense to me, I agree with @cpanato here, let's remove them if those are the issue :) TY

@justinsb justinsb force-pushed the dont_pass_deprecated_option branch from 186b5ae to 01a28dc Compare September 5, 2025 23:02
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 5, 2025
@justinsb
Copy link
Contributor Author

justinsb commented Sep 5, 2025

Changed comments to removal

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. and removed do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels Sep 6, 2025
Copy link
Member

@damdo damdo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 6, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: damdo, justinsb

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 5085352 into kubernetes-sigs:main Sep 6, 2025
20 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants